Movie Analysis Vengeance - 1149 Words

Vengeance Logline: When a young girl goes missing, her friend and older brother try to find out whether his father is responsible†¦ but the true culprit may be supernatural in nature. Key characters: Aubrie Nobir – a popular, intellectual teenager who is Jillian’s babysitter/friend. Nick Stilhare- an awkward, shy teenager who is on the baseball team, but he rarely plays. Luster Stilhare- an egotistical, abusive, workaholic father to Jillian and Nick. Vengeance- a omniscient Spirit who saves abused children by forming an army retaliating against the abusers. Jillian Stilhare- a bright, imaginative young girl who is obsessed with unicorns and sleeping in her parents’ bedroom. One night she goes missing, but leaves†¦show more content†¦He honks the horn and the lights turn on and off. His hairstyle changes from an Afro to four triangles and he has five black scars run down his face, he limps towards Jillian and holds his knife up high in the air when -- --The next day MIKE, the investigating officer and RENDICIÓ, the police chief, investigate the scene. They find a card with the letter â€Å"V† and one red circle addressed to Luster. He is questioned then released when no further evidence is found. The police officers think Jillian is dead. Later, friends and neighbors gather at the Stilhare’s house. GUTTER, the town drunk, tries to talk to AUBRIE but she ignores him. NICK asks Aubrie to help him find out who took his sister, but she refuses to get involved because she thinks Luster committed the crime. Ov er the next few days, Nick gives Aubrie gifts including Jillian’s locket. After being pressured by her parents, Aubrie caves in and helps Nick. The next day Aubrie bumps into BAILEY, a bully, who picks on a black girl because of her large lips. Bailey pulls out a knife on the black girl and Aubrie runs away, refusing to help. At her house she spots a package of knives on her front steps – but there’s no return address. Aubrie’s friends want to hang out with her, but she blows them off to sneak into Nick’s house to try and find evidence on Luster. While she is in the garage Carolyn storms into the garage and slams the door shut not noticing Aubrie. Aubrie hides underneathShow MoreRelatedMovie Analysis : Vengeance 1582 Words   |  7 PagesVengeance LOGLINE: When a young girl goes missing, her friend and older brother try to find out whether his father is responsible†¦ but the true culprit may be supernatural in nature. KEY CHARACTERS: Aubrie Nobir: a popular, intellectual teenager and Jillian’s babysitter/friend. Nick Stilhare: an awkward, shy teenager who is on the baseball team, but rarely plays. Luster Stilhare: an egotistical, abusive, workaholic father to Jillian and Nick. Jillian Stilhare: a bright, imaginativeRead More An Analysis of the Movie, Double Impact Essays729 Words   |  3 PagesAn Analysis of the Movie, Double Impact The movie opens twenty-five years ago in Hong Kong. The parents of two twin babies, Alex and Chad, had borrowed money from Raymond Zhang and Nigel Griffith, two lead smugglers. They needed the money in order to build a tunnel between Hong Kong and the mainland. After the tunnel was built and the money collected, Nigel Griffith and Raymond Zhang had a gang of hit men massacre Alex and Chads family. Frank Avery, a friendRead MoreBen Hur : A Classical World Film That Represents The Ancient Roman Civilization1815 Words   |  8 PagesIntroduction to Essay The movie, Ben-Hur is a classical world film that represents the ancient Roman civilization. The film was directed by William Wyler as an epic historical drama movie in 1959. The main cast features Charlton Heston who plays the role of Judah Ben-Hur, Stephen Boyd as Messala, Jack Hawkins as Quintus Arrius, Haya Harareet as Esther and Hugh Griffith as Sheik Ilderim (Wallace 5). The plot idea pegs back to the beginning of the 1st century where a merchant and a rich Jewish princeRead MoreEssay about Social-Psychological Principles of the Movie Unforgiven1333 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Movie Unforgiven Florida Institute of Technology Most movies have different social-psychological principles, however most people are watching movies to be entertained, and not to psychologically analyze them. There are many different principles that would be applicable to the film we are discussing however, I have chosen to analyze three scenes discussing altruism, self-fulfilling prophecy, and counterfactual thinking. Please review the following scenes and analysis from the movie Unforgiven: Read MoreEffective Leadership And The Leadership Essay1398 Words   |  6 Pagesanalyze the leadership theories and demonstrate different styles of leadership Nelson Mandela implemented in the movie â€Å"Invictus†. 2.0 Analysis: - 2.1. Scene 1: - Mandela Invites Pienaar: - Mandel invites Francois Pienaar, a white Afrikaner and South African (Springbok) Rugby team captain, at the government office and motivates him to win the 1995 Rugby World Cup. 2.1.1. Analysis Theory Integration: - Mandela invites Pienaar at the president office. The leadership of Pienaar was importantRead MoreEssay on Movie Review of Gladiator the Movie803 Words   |  4 Pageshis way up and earned the favour of the masses, Maximus then ends up duelling Commodus in a match of life and death. CHARACTER ANALYSIS: Maximus Decimus Meridius - The protagonist in the story, he was a general that led the Romans to victory against the Barbarians which made him earn the favor of Marcus Aurelius. Maximus is a brave man that seeks justice and vengeance for his murdered family. Commodus - The antagonist in the story, he is the son of Marcus Aurelius. Commodus is an arrogant manRead MoreHorror Of Jewish Revenge On The Nazis Essay2369 Words   |  10 Pageslengthy sequences of violence to transform Jewish vengeance into disturbingly inhumane behaviors. In order to exemplify the significance of Jewish revenge, I will first explain a brief history of Jewish revolts against the Nazis, most notably in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Next, I will describe the fantasy of revenge in Holocaust cinema. Third, I will analyze the specific sequences of armed vengeance in Inglourious Basterds. Finally, this analysis will lead into my discussion of the director’s depictionsRead MoreOthello, by William Shakespeare Essay1090 Words   |  5 PagesIn Shakespeare’s Othello, Iago is portrayed as a cruel puppet master, using his high order critical analysis and manipulative skills to exact on those he believe wronged him; as he weaves a web of deceit to ensnare the play’s protagonist (and namesake of the play) Othello. Various movie adaptations have portrayed the characters in different ways, often resulting in a fusion of the context of the age, artistic license and Shakespeare’s character. One such fusion is Stuart Burgeâ₠¬â„¢s 1965 filmic portrayalRead MoreJustice In Reginald Roses 12 Angry Men1532 Words   |  7 Pagesperson has however is not the only factor that comes into play, when establishing whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. The play, ‘12 angry men’, written by Reginald Rose, is a drama involved around a jury and a homicide case. In comparison, the movie, ‘To kill a mockingbird’, directed by Robert Mulligan, follows the tale of Atticus Finch, a lawyer, who defends a black man against fabricated rape charges, and the evils of racism and stereotyping. Both texts have strongly opposing beliefs on theRead MoreThe Godfather and the Meaning of Family1055 Words   |  5 PagesConnie Corleone; the daughter of the Don Vito gets married to an abusive and gets beaten down while pregnant, which later becomes one of the reasons for his death. Aside from that we also see many deaths cause by the vengeance and business. Another example is the opening of the movie, whe n Bonasera states â€Å"I believe in America. America has made my fortune. And I raised my daughter in the American fashion. I gave her freedom, but -- I taught her never to dishonor her family† as he tells Don Vito, his

The Crucible Free Essays

string(65) " use one of the following details to support their responses: a\." The Crucible Act Four Questions Short Response Answer the following questions based on your knowledge of the drama. Write a response on a separate sheet of paper. 1. We will write a custom essay sample on The Crucible or any similar topic only for you Order Now Where does Tituba think that the Devil is going to take her? 2. Give one example of how Abigail shows her dishonesty in this act. 3. What effect do the trials have on Salem? Use three details from the drama to support your answer. 4. When first arrives at the Salem jail, Danforth complains, â€Å"There is a prodigious stench in this place. How might this line be read to mean something besides a comment on the smell? 5. How is Giles Corey’s character reflected in his death? Use one detail from the drama to support your response. 6. What qualities does Proctor find within himself that prevent him from at last saving himself and signing the confession? Use details from the text to support your response. 7. Explain how Proctor is right or wrong for refusing to sign the confession. Use details to support your response. 8. A tragic hero’s fate, according to Aristotle, inspires pity and horror. Name the tragic hero in The Crucible, and describe how his or her fate inspires both pity and horror. 9. People accused of being Communists had a difficult time getting jobs; some even moved out of the United States in order to try to resume normal lives. How is Proctor’s situation like that of the people accused of Communist activities? 10. Based on the conversation involving Tituba, Sarah Good, and Herrick at the beginning of Act IV of The Crucible, what obsession of the day is weighing heavily on these characters? 11. In Act IV of The Crucible, Cheever comments on the â€Å"many cows wanderin’ the highroads, now their masters are in jail and much disagreement who they will belong to now. † What does the report of wandering cows symbolize about the effects of the witch trails on the society of Salem? 12. In Act IV of The Crucible, Parris complains to Danforth about the disappearance of Abigail and her apparent theft of his savings, as well as about the signs of growing discontent in the community over the wave of executions. Why does Danforth respond to him with contempt? 13. In Act IV of The Crucible, what does Danforth’s determination to proceed immediately with the executions symbolize about the nature the legal system? Explain your answer. 14. In Act IV of The Crucible, there are reports that the people of Andover have refused to cooperate with the witchcraft court there. What can the reader infer about the citizens of Andover from these reports? 15. In Act IV of The Crucible, it is evident that Elizabeth Proctor has changed during her imprisonment. How has she changed? Explain your answer, citing details from the text to support your answer. 6. In The Crucible, the line between religious and governmental authority is easily blurred and sometimes nonexistent. How is the relationship between church and state different in the present-day United States from the way it was at the time of The Crucible? 17. In Act IV of The Crucible, John Proctor anguishes over having his signed confession made public. In what respect is Proctor’s determinatio n to preserve his good name, and his resulting tragic downfall, an echo of the McCarthy era of the 1950s? 18. One definition of the word crucible is â€Å"a severe test. Use the chart below to identify the key way in which each of the listed characters is tested by the events of The Crucible. Then, in the right-hand column, indicate whether that character passed or failed the â€Å"test. † 19. Thinking About the Essential Question: How does literature shape or reflect society? A classic theme of literature in general—and of The Crucible in particular—is the conflict that can arise between a person’s individual ideals and principles on the one hand and the expectations of society on the other. Discuss this theme as it applies to two major characters in The Crucible. Support your answer with details from the play. The Crucible Act Four Questions Answer Section 1. ANS: Tituba says that the Devil is going to take her to Barbados where he is the â€Å"pleasureman† and there is no Hell (lines 30–32). PTS:10 2. ANS: Responses will vary. Students may use one of he following details to show Abigail’s dishonesty in this act: a. She has disappeared with Mercy Lewis, perhaps on a ship (lines 142–160). b. She has stolen Parris’s money from his strongbox (lines 161–165). PTS:10 3. ANS: Responses will vary. Students may say that the trials have negatively affected Salem because the trials themselves have raised suspicion, families are being torn apart, work is not getting done, and people are turning on each other over property. Students may use three of the following details to support their responses: a. Cheever explains that cows wander around town because their owners are in jail (lines 108–112 and 298–299). b. Townspeople fight over who now owns the cows (lines 108–112). c. Parris fears that the people in Salem will riot because many people being hanged have not confessed to guilt. Their friends and neighbors know them as good people, so they think that innocent people are being hanged (lines 190–194 and 203–210). d. Children who are now orphans because their parents have been executed or put in jail wander the town looking for food and shelter (lines 297–298). e. Crops are not harvested because the farmers are in jail or dead (lines 299–300). f. People are afraid because they do not know if or when they will be accused next (lines 300–301). PTS:20 4. ANS: Students should say that the â€Å"stench† represents the rotten treatment the innocent people of Salem have experienced at the hands of a court that thinks itself just PTS:10 5. ANS: Responses will vary. Students should say that Giles’s intelligence and stubbornness as well as his faith are reflected in his death. Students may use one of the following details to support their responses: a. You read "The Crucible" in category "Essay examples" He showed stubbornness when he stood mute to the indictment (line 447). b. He showed intelligence and faith when he died â€Å"Christian under the law† (line 450). c. Because he did not answer the indictment, his sons inherited his property (lines 450– 453). By allowing his sons to inherit his land, Giles illustrated intelligence. d. When they pressed him with stones, he only said, â€Å"More weight† (lines 457–460). Giles’ lack of fear shows his stubbornness. PTS:10 6. ANS: [B-Test] Responses will vary. Students may say that in spite of Proctor believing he is no saint, the examples of Elizabeth and Rebecca Nurse force him to look at himself as less than a saint. However, when he must tarnish his own name and abandon his friends, he finds the strength and goodness to refuse their demands. He finally sees himself as having some good. Students may use the following details to support their responses: a. He finds honesty when he says he cannot die like a saint (lines 479–485). b. He says it is a fraud for him to go like a saint like the others (lines 543–549). c. He says that if his action is evil, it is appropriate for him to confess his guilt (lines 555–559). d. He finally signs his name because he feels he is not good enough to die with the others but refuses to condemn his friends (lines 674–719). e. Proctor is too honest to accuse anyone else of witchcraft (lines 653–655). f. He finds strength when he says he has given Danforth his soul but will not give the court his name (lines 725–730). g. He tears up his confession, finally sees goodness in himself, and is ready to face death (lines 745–761). PTS:20 7. ANS: [C-Test] Responses will vary. Some students may say that Proctor is right to refuse to sign the confession because it is a lie and it may condemn others. Students who support Proctor’s decision may use the following details to support their responses: a. He knows that confessing to witchcraft is confessing to a lie (lines 488–489) and he does not want to give in to the evil men who force him to choose. b. Danforth tries to force Proctor to name other people as having pacts with the Devil, but Proctor knows that he cannot condemn his friends or other innocent people (lines 637– 638). . He refuses to let Danforth and the others use him as an example in the village (lines 699–701). Other students may say that Proctor is wrong to refuse to sign the confession because he gives up his life and possibly ruins the lives of his family members in return. Students who do not support Proctor’s decision may use the following details to support the ir responses: a. His wife Elizabeth is pregnant and needs his help with another child (lines 272–273), especially as she may still be executed after she delivers the child that she is carrying. b. He is leaving behind children who cannot take care of themselves, especially because his wife is in jail (lines 419–421). c. He only seems worried about his pride. He lets pride stop him from going all the way and signing the confession, explaining that he cannot face his children if he turns his friends in, though it would be better if he was alive for his children (lines 688–689, 699–701, and 703–704). PTS:20 8. ANS: Answers will vary. Following is one possible answer: Mr. Proctor is a tragic hero. After Mr. Proctor’s indiscretion with Abigail, he refuses to yield to temptation again. He turns his attention to his wife and is faithful to her. When he is doomed, no matter what decision he makes, one can only pity him. Proctor is led by honorable principles and motives. When this innocent man dies protecting his and his family’s honor, the audience is horrified. PTS:21KEY:analyze | character | The Crucible, Act 4 9. ANS: Answers will vary. Following is one possible answer: During the height of the McCarthy era, many professionals, including numerous writers and entertainers, were refused work. Careers were shattered and talented people went without a livelihood. Like those innocents, Mr. Proctor seals his fate should he sign a false testimony. To discuss his confession is one thing; to see his name signed to lies is another. Would he be able to make a living? Would he have the trust of his community? His name, like the names of many of McCarthy’s victims, would evoke distrust and disgrace if he signed a false confession. PTS:20KEY:analyze | character | The Crucible, Act 4 10. ANS: All three of the characters speak of the Devil and/or Hell. PTS:1 11. ANS: The wandering cows symbolize the chaos and disintegration of the social order of Salem that has resulted from the witch trials. PTS:1 12. ANS: Danforth regards Parris as a selfish man, someone who is interested mainly in his own well-being and his own reputation. He sees that Parris is now wavering about the executions not because of any principle, but because there is evidence that there is dissatisfaction with the witch hunt in the town that could cost Parris his reputation and job. PTS:1 13. ANS: Danforth’s determination to proceed immediately with the executions symbolizes the imperfection of the machinery of the law. It shows that the legal system can sometimes enforce or perpetuate injustice. PTS:1 14. ANS: The reader can infer that the citizens of Andover are resisting the kind of hysteria that has befallen Salem. PTS:1 15. ANS: She has become less harsh in her judgment of others. Her final comment of the play exemplifies this change. PTS:1 16. ANS: Now the separation between church and state is much clearer and better defined than it was at the time of The Crucible. In fact, it is a basic part of the U. S. Constitution and legal system. PTS:1 17. ANS: During the McCarthy investigations of the 1950s, reputations and lives were ruined by people who â€Å"named names† or confessed to irresponsible allegations just to save themselves. PTS:1 18. ANS: Sample answers: Reverend Parris–whether he is true to the Christian ideals of his calling as a minister–fails, (because he promotes a hysteria of lying and death, and proves more concerned about his own welfare than the welfare of others). Reverend Hale–whether he is true to the Christian ideals of his calling as a minister–passes (because he struggles with his conscience and comes down on the side of truth and justice to resist the hysteria of the witch trials). Judge Danforth–whether he is an impartial and fair judge and enforcer of the law–passes and fails (shows a minimal amount of respect for proper legal procedure, but proves more interested in swift justice than finding out the truth and attaining true justice). Elizabeth Proctor–whether she will value the truth over her personal well-being—passes (because she refuses to admit to being a witch to save herself and with good intentions lies at the end to try to help her husband). John Proctor–whether he will risk his life to uphold true Christian ideals–passes (he refuses to admit to the false accusations against him; even though he wavers at the end, he triumphs by refusing to sign a public declaration, even though this act of conscience costs him his life). PTS:1 19. ANS: Students might note that John refuses to implicate others despite the intense pressures from the court to do so. Students may also say that he is ashamed of his actions earlier in the play and is trying make up for her earlier lack of moral courage. They might also note that Elizabeth resists pressure from Hale to try to persuade John to save his life by falsely confessing to the charges, for she realizes that standing for honor and conscience are too important to trade in at any price, even one’s life. Students might also note that the Reverend Hale is torn between his loyalty to the court and official religious doctrine and his understanding that many of the witchcraft accusations are unjust and based on lies—a conflict between loyalty to church/community and individual conscience. PTS:1 How to cite The Crucible, Essay examples The Crucible Free Essays â€Å"Try not to become a man of success but rather try to become a man of value. †-Albert Einstein Einstein’s thougts are also found in the play by Arthur Miller, The Crucible. In The Crucible, many characters are asked to compromise their integrity in exchange for their lives. We will write a custom essay sample on The Crucible or any similar topic only for you Order Now John Proctor was one such character, but he refused to give up his integrity. He wanted to die with a good name in the eyes of the other villiagers. Another of he main characters, Abigail Williams, displays a complete lack of integrity. She lies and cheats so that she can get exactly what she wants with no regard for the safety of the other characters. During the play, John Proctor, a farmer, is faced with a decision that would ultimately lead to his death. John Proctor displays his integrity in several tough situations throughout the play. Proctor is arrested on charges of witchcraft along with his wife, Elizabeth. The people that are arrested for witchcraft live if they confess, but hang if they deny the charges, even if the charges are not truthful. This plays an important part in the testing of John’s integrity later in the play. In the beginning, we find out that Proctor had an affair with the niece of the town reverend, Abigail Williams. This displays a lack of integrity for John, but nobody knows about it until later. John shows his integrity when he confesses to this affair later in the play. At the beginnig of the play, the Proctor’s want no part in the witch trials. They get dragged into the proceedings when Abigail accuses Elizabeth of hurting her with a voodoo doll. John has integegrity when he tries to save his wife from being hanged. He gets depositions from others in the town that show how good his wife was. He has Mary Warren, who was working in the Proctor house, confess that she was the one who made the doll and stuck the needle in it. This does not work though, and Mary turns on Proctor and gets him arrested. When Proctor is in jail, he shows his integrity once again. He knows that he has the opportunity to confess to witchcraft, and this will get him out of jail. He decides to do this after he talks with his wife, even though he knows his cofession would be a lie. He actually signs the confession, but he tears it up. The judge told him that they would hang his signed confession on the door of the church for all the people to see. Proctor couldn’t stand to see that all the people would think of him as such a bad person, so he tore up the confession. He says, â€Å"I have given you my soul, leave me my name! † Proctor also sees a lack of integrity in Reverend Parris, who he believes cares more about money than his duty to God. How to cite The Crucible, Papers The Crucible Free Essays â€Å"We the jury in the above entitled action, find the defendant, Orenthal James Simpson, not guilty of the crime of murder. † This famous quote was made during the famous court case of O. J. We will write a custom essay sample on The Crucible or any similar topic only for you Order Now Simpson vs. the State of California over the murder of two individuals. What made this case so famous was all the evidence the jury had that proved Simpson guilty, but was found not guilty in the end. The court, whether it be a single person or a jury, make mistakes daily. But sometimes they are not mistakes; they are acts of revenge or sympathy against that person being accused or, one of not knowing what else to do. This court room speculation is seen in Arthur Millers novel The Crucible and the film, Good Night and Good Luck. These two resources connect by a very similar plot line even thought one is factual and the other is based off of facts. The similarities and differences between main characters, John Proctor and Edward Murrow are seen by their human traits, actions they took and the results of those actions due to pressure by court cases. Edward Murrow and John Proctor are very similar by certain traits they carried while under court speculation and drama. Both men wanted to stand up for what they believed was right. They were honest men until the court and certain people wanted to take that away from them. John Proctor told the truth because unlike the court, he knew what he did and did not do. Proctor knew he was guilty of adultery but neither he nor his wife was involved in witchcraft which he was being accused of. Murrow did the exact same thing in his reporting of the McCarthy trials, he wanted people to get the truth. He would go to extraordinary lengths in reporting and drama with his company, CBS to tell the truth. One major difference in the traits of these two men was the amount of support they had. Edward Murrow was a household name that had viewers and coworkers behind him and supporting him even if their company disagreed. If Senator McCarthy verbally accused Murrow of certain Soviet actions, reporters would be right there to get evidence to clear his name. John Proctor had less of an advantage in this aspect. It was him against a town with only one woman behind him that was in jail herself. Elizabeth Proctor pushed for her husband even knowing of his affair and her being accused of witchcraft. These two men had similar traits but one key trait of support, which Proctor lacked, seemed to be a very important one in the end. Edward Murrow was reporting on falsely accused individuals while John Proctor was living it. The actions of these two men under the spotlight of accusations showed some similarities and difference between them. Both men tried to clear their name of the false accusations set before them. Murrow looked into the eyes of the camera and told America he was not involved in Soviet relations. Even the report made by Senator McCarthy of Murrow being involved in a Soviet group twenty years ago, was shot down. John Proctor tried to clear his name as well but found it difficult with the court telling him what and what not to do. These two men had differences in their actions by how they went about them. Murrow thoroughly investigated before claiming or saying anything to America. John however, not having as much support, made excuses and started accusing others of witchcraft. Proctor fell under the spell of the court and said what would make them happy just so they would stop. He soon began not following his initial idea of telling the truth which Murrow kept through out the accusations and pressures from McCarthy and his boss, the CEO of Columbia Broadcast Systems. Each of these actions made by the men caused the plot line to end with different affects felt. In the two story lines, both men were falsely accused but resulted in different endings. John Proctor was accused of witchcraft, which he tried but failed standing up for. Edward Murrow was accused of being a communist but stood up for himself creating a different ending. Proctor, unlike Murrow, did not have the power and evidence to clear his name of witchery and also had the accusation of adultery. The affects of his lack of support end with him being hanged of something he tried to prove to the court he did not do. Murrow on the other hand, had support and evidence which caused his story ending to be much different than Proctors. Due to his amount of determination and with the modern day advances he had, Murrow became a legend for his reporting especially during the McCarthy trials. He went to a new level of reporting by standing up for himself and what he knew he was not, a communist. If Proctor had the modern day media or even more support, one can only wonder how his outcome would have been affected. John Proctor and Edward Murrow, two stand out characters of two different eras, share similarities and differences in their traits, actions taken and results of those actions. These men were standing up for themselves against strongly set accusers who treated them as if they committed horrific crimes. Whether John did commit witchcraft of Edward was a communist is overshadowed by the way people accused and investigated the men or did not investigate in John’s case. The creditability of the court system is strongly questioned after reading The Crucible and watching Good Night and Good Luck and makes one wonder how trustworthy and fair are the American courts really are. How to cite The Crucible, Essay examples